it’s louder in your head.


why would gen X teachers behave differently from gen Xers in other jobs?

Posted in culture, education, politics by fouralarmfire on the 27 August 2007

over and over, articles like this one cite very real statistics that about one-third of new teachers leave the classroom within three years, and about half leave within five. okay, yes, this is problematic because in combination with the fact that most teachers’ retirement systems allow teachers to retire after 30 years without substantial incentives to stay longer (22 + 30 = 52), lots of teachers are leaving the classroom at both ends. attrition is something around 9 percent a year, and it has the potential to grow even larger.

now, don’t get me wrong, i know that teacher recruitment and retention is a major problem. but the assumption that young teachers are leaving because there is a problem with the education system seems really stupid considering that changing jobs every 2-4 years is a pretty defining characteristic of generation X in the workforce. we watched our (mostly) baby boom generation parents deal with the aftermath of the conflict between their gold-watch attitude and the volatile business world of the ’80s and ’90s. we learned early on that the only place in the world you can’t be replaced is in your family, so we don’t have the kind of loyalty to our employers that prior generations did. we believe that the way for us to get ahead in our careers is to switch jobs and move up the career ladder because no one is going to do that for us.

i started my career in the classroom, taught for 3 years, left and went into a job at a policy non-profit, kept that job for about 2.5 years, left and went to work for the US department of education. so, yeah, i’m 29, and i’ve had 3 major job changes in the 7 years since i completed undergrad. pretty typical, i think.

it seems to me that rather than whining about young teachers leaving the classroom, we should be changing the pay and authority structures in the education system to meet the needs of modern employees. generation X teachers are not going to behave differently than those in other positions, and we certainly aren’t going to stay in a place that treats us from the get-go like we’re going to leave. if we want them to stay in teaching, we need

  1. career ladders that allow effective teachers to be promoted in responsibility and salary while still teaching
  2. pay scales based on effectiveness rather than years of service and education level
  3. to appreciate the contributions that they are making today, nurture their professional development and wish them well when it is time for them to move on

from my perspective, as a former teacher whose future plans were totally changed by my experience in the classroom, young teachers leaving to pursue higher education, other career fields and family will be lifelong activists for high-quality public education no matter where their career path takes them, and that’s not such a bad thing either.

5 Responses to 'why would gen X teachers behave differently from gen Xers in other jobs?'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'why would gen X teachers behave differently from gen Xers in other jobs?'.

  1. jgtobe said,

    What’s fascinating is that I had this exact same thought this morning, did a quick google search to find the statistics on job-switching in my generation to strengthen my argument, and this post came up. I haven’t thought through this idea fully enough, but I agree that it is an important component of the policy discussion.

    ps – i too taught for 3 years and now work at the department.

  2. Kilkoi said,

    Cool topic! ;)

  3. Kelly said,

    It’s true what they say, “Teachers are born, not made.” What experiences did you have in the classroom that allowed you to stay only three years? Was it poor discipline or poor classroom management? I understand wanting to move up the ladder but why did you have to choose teaching as the first step? Did you think teaching was easy? Or, was it that you knew it would be easy to get a position since no one is banging down the doors to get into education? Would it appear noble for any potential employer?

    What you fail to realize is that you spent three years hurting kids – our future. If you didn’t have control in your classroom, you weren’t able to instruct, you hurt our kids. If you did have control and was able to teach, you left the kids high and dry because you wanted to move up the ladder faster.

    What capacity would a teacher work in that would pay them more and give them more responsibility as they move up the ladder? Isn’t TEACHING enough? Let me tell you, three years of teaching experience would not qualify you to do anything more than teach for another three to get true experience to move forward in the career. Would you trust someone with only three years of classroom experience to make decisions for you?

    What type of structure would you suggest that would allow teachers to move up? Who would define effectiveness and set the standards?

    Wish them well when it time to move on? WHAT?

    Being an educator requires you to be loyal. It is a calling for people who understand the importance of education, stability and cultural responsibility.

    You jumping from job to job within 7 years shows you inability to remain stable. Your employment record would cause a red flag for any potential employer. BUT, what you did was USE the educational system for your own personal advantage when it’s core is based on giving back to society.

    Generation X has both helped and hurt our society. A true discussion needs to be had about the importance of stability in the workforce – especially education.

  4. Alexwebmaster said,

    Hello webmaster
    I would like to share with you a link to your site
    write me here preonrelt@mail.ru


Leave a Reply