it’s louder in your head.


the morality of the lottery, or why 4alarm is a big fat hypocrite.

Posted in culture, education, georgia/atlanta, politics by fouralarmfire on the 11 October 2007
Tags: , , ,

LotteryToday, I read this article from the New York Times on how little revenue lotteries create in the scheme of K-12 education budgets, and how the business of running lotteries is eating increasingly into the already slim profits. In fact, the blog entry through which I read the story was titled “What has six balls and screws teachers?” These lotteries have exploded across the country – 42 states and the District of Columbia now have them. In most instances, the lotteries fund education projects of various flavors. And this is how they are sold to the electorate. “The lottery is great! It’ll pay for cute little children to learn how to read. All for freeeeee to the taxpayers!” That sort of shit. I remember this exact propaganda when Virginia passed a referendum to start a lottery when I was a kid.

But you know what, even when you discount the added cost of the social burden of gambling addiction and such, the lottery doesn’t pay for shit. The people who buy lottery tickets pay for it, and who buys lottery tickets? Poor people. So, we’re taking money from poor people to pay for education for all the residents of the state — poor and rich. Why not start taxing arthritis medication to pay for highway improvements?

Oh, apples and oranges you say, it’s a choice to buy lottery tickets. But, wait, I say. Why do the schools need the lottery money again? Because the system is broken. Who are the folks who are most likely to be in the most broken schools? Poor people.

So, we’re asking the very people who our education system didn’t teach enough about probability and economics for them to realize that their $5 a week would be better invested in the stock market or in a shoe box under their mattress to pay for education for everyone in our state. So, it is still a choice to buy a lottery ticket, but it sure as hell isn’t an informed one. And in some cases state propaganda makes it seem like buying a lottery ticket is like buying one of those little shamrocks for a dollar at the grocery store. It’s for the chiiiiiildren.

But now we see that it isn’t. The NYT article describes that the proceeds of lotteries are going to the marketing machine and bigger and bigger prizes to encourage (poor) folks to choose to buy more and more lottery tickets. For the chiiiiiiildren. And very little of that money is actually going to the kids. If the lottery were a 501 (c) 3 (a non-for-profit), Charity Navigator would have given it the worst overhead percentage rating in the history of the universe.

The Georgia lottery’s top funding priorities are universal prekindergarten and the HOPE scholarship, which sends any Georgia public high school graduate with a B average to a state college tuition-free. I rant pretty frequently in real life about how the HOPE scholarship in Georgia is patently immoral because a) it “taxes” poor people to pay for rich kids to go to college and b) it was “sold” to the electorate as a program that would increase the number of poor kids who would have the opportunity to go to college when, in fact, its true purpose was to stifle the brain drain of smart kids opting for out-of-state schools and out-of-Georgia lives (read: lots of smart college educated people in Georgia = attractive workforce in a state with pro-corporate laws).

Now, this is where the hypocrite part of me comes in: my flame goes to school for free on HOPE. I’ve never purchased a Georgia lottery ticket IN MY LIFE. Perfect case of what nearly always happens when what’s-best-for-humanity and what’s-best-for-individual conflict. And I’m even a hyper-informed consumer.

So, therein lies the question… how do we wean ourselves off of the poisoned milk of the lottery? Especially when our policy-makers are desperate to wring every last drop into the bucket, lottery customers don’t realize they are being duped and the fat cats in the big business lottery machine are laughing themselves to the bank.

2 Responses to 'the morality of the lottery, or why 4alarm is a big fat hypocrite.'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'the morality of the lottery, or why 4alarm is a big fat hypocrite.'.

  1. chutney said,

    $4 of hypocrite right here.

    My favorite rationalitzation is that I’ll give x-percent to charity. Or set up a foundation.

    What if the tickets were $2 instead of $1? Would raising the “price point” make a difference, making them less of an “oh well” throw-away?


  2. Hey, I did always contribute $1 to the over-100 million Powerball pool at work last year…just in case everyone else hit it. Wouldn’t want to be stuck with all the work to do by myself! :P

    I don’t think it’s hypocritical for you to play, though, really, because you don’t think your money is going to a good cause. The article cites surveys that show that folks in states with lottery funds earmarked for education actually think twice about voting for school-related bond issues and tax hikes because they sincerely believe the lottery is paying for the schools. I wouldn’t argue that lotteries shouldn’t exist, but they shouldn’t be government-backed! It’s like government-endorsed predatory lending or something. I don’t question the pay-day lenders’ right to run a business, but I would be really fucking angry if Sonny Perdue forwarded state-run pay-day lending in the next session.

    Anyway, I don’t think that a $2 price tag would make a difference. It might become prohibitive for the poorest folks if you raised the price to, say $20. But there isn’t a price point that is going to make middle and upper class folks become stupid enough to plunk down their cash for 1-in-a-gajillion odds.

    The thing that is really getting me about it too is the profit margin. I mean, a non-profit would get SHUT DOWN for spending that large a proportion of its revenue on overhead. The board would probably get sued. And many are even coming up with incredibly clever models for raising money through sales and such like Cafe 458 here in Atlanta or uh… Girl Scout cookies, anyone? I think that some of the charities that got *slammed* in recent years about the proportion of their donations that went to programming did way better than 30 percent. In a “good” charity, that number should near 90 percent!

    An interesting thing about your playing, though, Chutney — my parents always did when I was a kid too. Wonder if it’s an Okie thing.


Leave a Reply